In our particle accelerators, we have what we call ‘evidence’ that we can create and destroy matter, and in some certain cases produce energy. Thus, at least, going by ‘evidence’, we cannot refute this, but we can attempt to question it and apply for a better method of creating and destroying matter.
This better method is what I want to discuss with you in this scientific post. Since modern physics, we have been creating and destroying matter, and we have evidence that this scientific exercise sometimes produces electromagnetic energy.
I want you to take note that I mentioned “electromagnetic energy”. This is because there is another non-mechanical energy in the universe which we have not recognized when we create and destroy matter, and this energy is gravi-electromagnetic energy.
While we (may) have observed matter emerge from electromagnetic energy, which in itself can be seen as an approximation of gravi-electromagnetic energy, this observation is not the actual process of creation. During creation, matter emerged purely from gravi-electromagnetic energy and not from electromagnetic energy.
But there is no violation if we observe matter emerge from electromagnetic energy. The universe is a vast place where matter and the two non-mechanical energies interact in an inseparable union, and the interconversion of matter and electromagnetic energy also applies to matter and gravi-electromagnetic energy and in a deeper sense.
We know that during creation matter was not created by particle collisions of the kind we engage in our particle accelerators, but directly from non-mechanical energy which condensed or materialized to produce matter.
During creation, it was the gravi-electromagnetic wave that was condensed to produce matter by the pre-cosmic force that caused the rise of a standing gravi-electromagnetic field.
What we call matter became the nodal points in this extensive standing field called the gravi-electromagnetic field. This was how matter was created and not by mechanical collisions.
What does this original description of the creation of matter imply? Firstly, it implies that our solely mathematical discovery and understanding of the interconvertibility of matter with the two forms of energy is not enough.
Yes, it is an important part of our understanding of the universe, but it is not the whole story of creation. Creation as it occurred as the directed transformation of “the one thing” is not covered in our understanding of matter and its relationship with energy.
But this transformation that led to creation can only come by us understanding that “the one thing” is not energy but inertia. What we call light and gravity or light and gravi-electromagnetic wave are in their unreducable nature forms of inertia and not forms of energy.
The understanding of the universe in terms of energy is not the absolute fundamental level of understanding as we may have thought.
We must now understand that the universe is constituted by three cosmic essences, which are absolute space, absolute time and inertia. Energy is not fundamental.
So, if we have progressed in understanding to know that energy is the content of matter, post-modern physics now informs us further, which is that inertia is the content of energy.
It is this basic understanding that the true essence with which the universe was built is inertia that we come to a complete understanding of the creation of matter, even if we discuss it in terms of energy like I did above.
The creation of matter from gravi-electromagnetic energy was not a chaotic event or process, it was a well fine-tuned and purposeful event to ensure that a standing gravi-electromagnetic field was produced and that matter emerged.
Creation was not really about the direct creation of matter, it was about the direct creation of a standing gravi-electromagnetic field, after which matter became the result. This is why the universe is fine-tuned.
Creation was about making real cosmic music which is what the universe really is. So, the creation of matter was not just the direct result of the interconvertibility of mass and energy, rather matter was due to the purposeful creation of a standing gravi-electromagnetic field.
The standing field process of creation informs us that creation was due to an exact procedure and not the blind accident of the interconvertibility of mass and energy. And by whatever means we want to really create and destroy matter, we have to purely engage gravi-electromagnetic energy and not the chaotic mechanical collisions of particles.
Now, it is in realizing that there exists an essence more fundamental than energy and which is inertia, that we begin to understand and embrace the broader, more fundamental and more purposeful description of creation as what occurred due to the orchestrated standing field process and not just due to the blind accident of the interconvertibility of mass and energy.
I really hope you can see the mystery of creation that I am revealing to you in this article.
The creation of matter from mechanical collisions is not the really how matter was created and when matter is converted into electromagnetic energy, it’s not really how matter is destroyed.
These practical possibilities and observations may be due to the interconvertibility of mass and energy, but like I want you to know, creation goes deeper.
Matter is really created when we engage gravi-electromagnetic energy and matter is really destroyed when it is dissolved back into gravi-electromagnetic energy. This is how we can really create and destroy matter mimicking creation.
There are inherent subtleties in the universe and I want us to grasp all of them!
This article comes today because it is my firm conviction that when we practically master gravi-electromagnetic energy like we have practically mastered electromagnetic energy, we will discover more refined and non-chaotic ways of creating and destroying matter that may or may not align with the standing field process of creation, but that will show that we have come to the maturity of scientific knowledge and the subtle ways of the universe.
To really create and destroy matter we have to know the real, purposeful story of creation, which is beyond what blind or rigorous mathematics can inform us.
Smashing particles to create and destroy matter does not mimic creation in any way and it is not the only way we can create and destroy matter. One can refer to it as a rough practical approximation. There is another way, and it is by mastering gravi-electromagnetic energy in its purest application.
Could it be possible that we too can condense matter from the gravi-electromagnetic field or from inertia, which as I have said is the Philosopher’s stone from which the universe was built, and also destroy matter in a reverse fashion?
In a deeper alchemical description, since energy is a form of inertia, then we can really create matter by mastering how to transform inertia and not really energy. We have to begin to explore and understand broadly the new law of conservation of inertia.
This law is the true alchemical law of creation that suits the non-chaotic and refined process of creation that post-modern physics now reveals to us.
In this new era, science will mimic in an exact manner the way of the universe. Matter will be created and destroyed by the directed transformation of inertia just as creation was effected.Matter will be created and destroyed by the directed transformation of inertia just as creation was effected.Click To Tweet
This cold science will be of the old world as we are further enlightened about the way of the universe and the better method to create and destroy matter.
The new law of conservation of inertia will definitely transform how we do practical science just as the law of conservation of energy transformed how we did practical science. Particle physics will be qualitatively transformed by this new and great discovery.
The well-understood application of the law of conservation of inertia is what will assist us in improving the way in which we create and destroy matter, and this method is the complete simplification of our practical understanding of the universe.
This article assures us that the way of the universe is not only comprehensible, it is also practicable. This is why I sometimes call the scientists of this age philosophers, for they will apply in a harmonious manner the methods of the universe for the practical benefits of mankind.
We have a wrong view of creation when we think that matter and energy together came from nothing. No, rather creation was progressive and matter came from gravi-electromagnetic energy and is even a condensation of gravi-electromagnetic energy, and in the absolute universe, there is no such thing as nothing. (I will talk more about this in a future article on the new cosmology.)
This understanding alongside the understanding of the law of conservation of inertia will assist us in creating and destroying matter by other ways that align with creation and not necessarily by mechanical collisions.
The law of conservation of inertia is a testament of a higher principle in the universe beyond the discovered interconvertibility of mass and energy, and this higher cosmic principle brings will into the creation and destruction of matter, giving us a more experiential method of creating and destroying matter beyond the rigorous methods of modern physics.
Also, according to post-modern physics, the accelerating particles that are smashed in our accelerators carry gravi-electromagnetic potential energy, so the gravi-electromagnetic energy is involved in our particle collisions that produce other matter even though we were not aware of it until now.
But in this article, I speak of a refined and non-mechanical application of gravi-electromagnetic energy that can come by the assisting understanding of the law of conservation of inertia.
From this article, it is easy to see that I have discussed, though in a random manner and without respect to placements, how matter can be created and destroyed in three ascending levels of understanding.
The first is through mechanical collisions and electromagnetic energy which we have been applying so far. The second is through the application of gravi-electromagnetic energy which as I have informed you is the true energy engaged to create matter in the beginning by the more refined and non-chaotic process of creation. The third is through the transformation of what Hermes called “the one thing”, which is inertia.
From the first method to the third method is a progression of the true understanding of the mystery of creation and how we can mimic it. The direct practical interaction with the universe through the understanding of “the one thing” (inertia) is the greatest mastery of the metaphysical laws of the universe.
It is the end of how we can really create and destroy matter, and at this point, we would have become God, knowing true science and false science.
Until next time,
I will be here.
– M. V. Echa