Table of Contents
Subtitle: Gravity and the Principle of Non-inertia
The Central Question: Does gravity exists or not?
I have been looking into the internet lately and I have come across some references or information about the flat Earth model. It comes as a surprise to me that after all these years there are still individuals who uphold the flat Earth model.
They even have a society which is called The Flat Earth Society. And from what I read, the Flat Earth Society was established in 1956 by Samuel Shenton. This is all very interesting to me!
Unlike other times, I would not have cared about the controversy, but I have decided to talk about it because the flat Earth society (now) thinks gravity does not exist. No, no, no, this is not true, gravity exists!
I want to enrich if not resolve this controversy by further revealing to us the nature of gravity and how we should understand the motion of the Earth, whether its rotation or its revolution, through the new insights emanating from post-modern physics.
So, you may find that what I now teach about the universe is unknown to you, and if this is the case then read my other articles and also get my e-book and join me in post-modern physics. For one, I am really less concerned about the shape of the Earth, even though I, for now, take that it is spherical.
However, I want us to realize that with the laws that govern gravity and how gravity influences bodies, it would make no difference to our experience of the motion of the Earth whether the Earth is flat or spherical.
Have you ever wondered why we don’t experience the motion of the Earth? To every one of us, going by our experience of the Earth, it is still. Why? This question is more important than even our concern for the shape of the Earth.
This question confronts our understanding of gravity, and if this article accomplishes anything, it is to further accentuate the existence of gravity since the Flat-Earthers conclude that the Earth is not pulled into spherical shape because gravity does not exist.
The New Cosmology: Why No Flat Earth
But in light of post-modern physics, we must understand that the formation of the Earth and of other heavenly bodies is due to the gravi-electromagnetic wave of which gravity is simply one of its components alongside light.
Gravity really has nothing to do with the shape of the Earth, but the gravi-electromagnetic wave does. The gravi-electromagnetic wave, like I always tell you in this blog, is the second non-mechanical wave in the universe.
So, if we are talking about the shape of the Earth, we must realized that the Earth was formed by gravi-electromagnetic wave and not by gravity. The new science forces us to change our understanding of cosmology.
The absence of truth in the old science is what is further fueling most of the controversies of science. When we find out the right interpretation or understanding of natural phenomena, I think most of these dissensions will reduce and man can march towards his grand purpose.
One wrong interpretation of the universe which emerges from the old science is the big bang theory. In simple terms, the big band purports that the universe was formed when energy exploded from a singularity in the universe aeons ago. Thus, matter was born from the interconversion of mass and energy.
This explosive event then spread towards other regions of space and time. Listen, the big bang theory is not true. The universe was not born from a singularity. The concept of singularity is replaced in post-modern physics by the concept of commonality.
The concept of commonality emerges from the new cosmology which informs us that the universe is a standing gravi-electromagnetic field. The new cosmology takes us back to our labs and music halls.
We don’t need to create some unreachable conditions in our particle accelerators in order to understand creation, we have been creating the same conditions ever since man began to produce music. How do we produce standing fields? In terms of string instruments, we produce standing fields by striking a string.
This is how the universe was formed, from the energy of gravi-electromagnetic wave and not light. In the big bang theory, light plays a major role as the conversion factor between matter and energy, but in the new cosmology, the gravi-electromagnetic wave plays the major role as the conversion factor between matter and energy.
This does not imply that the Einstein’s energy equation is now irrelevant in the new cosmology, rather it only implies that it has no role to play in the creation of the universe. The gravi-electromagnetic energy is what was responsible for the formation of heavenly bodies and not the electromagnetic energy.
Matter was not born from the interconversion of matter and electromagnetic energy, rather matter was born from the interconversion of matter and gravi-electromagnetic energy. The second non-mechanical wave in the universe is responsible for creation.
The new cosmology makes us realize that we have been replicating the exact process of creation all this while. When we produce music and strike strings to produce standing fields, we are replicating the same exact process of creation.
However, while the waves we produce in our labs are mechanical waves, the wave of creation is non-mechanical. The non-mechanical wave of creation is the gravi-electromagnetic wave. The new cosmology is the true cosmology of string theory.
The true form of string theory which is emerging from the new science is doing away with the interpretations of the universe as espoused by standard physics. The new cosmology informs us that matter was not first formed at a single point in the universe, rather it was formed at various points in the universe.
Creation did not begin at a one singularity point and spread from there to other parts of the universe. Creation began at several commonal points in the universe with no preference attached to any point.
Whatever prove of an explosive event from a singularity point during the early history of the universe now has to be re-interpreted in light of gravi-electrodynamics which shows us the relativistic consequences of the motion of accelerating bodies relative to gravi-electromagnetic wave.
This is the shift from the concept of singularity or the singularity interpretation to the concept of commonality or the commonality interpretation. The commonality interpretation informs us that all the galaxies were birthed together and at different points in the universe from the same cosmic process of creation, and not from a singularity whatsoever.
(In fact, there is no such thing as a singularity in the universe. The so called black hole which modern scientists think is a singularity point in the universe is flawed. I want you to read this my other article so that you will understand the nature of black holes. Singularity does not exist in the universe.
Also, the concept of commonality or the commonality interpretation which gives no special preference to any point in the universe unifies with the new wavecentric model of the universe. I want you to read my articles. We must abolish the concept of singularity or the singularity interpretation from physics.)
This implies that in the absence of matter, there can still be an energy field in the universe. This energy field which spreads across the universe in the absence of any matter is the gravi-electromagnetic field. It is what the ancients called the aether.
Ironically, and in fact, the question of what banged, is unanswerable by the big bang theory. The new cosmology informs us that gravi-electromagnetic waves were what banged or interfered to produce the universe, just as opposite waves bang or interfere with each other to produce standing waves.
So, to understand why the Earth should take a spherical form, you just have to understand the new truth that the universe is a standing gravi-electromagnetic wave. The heavenly bodies are simply nodal points in the cosmic sea of gravi-electromagnetic wave.
Now, if the nodes of standing fields which we produced using strings or any other physical medium are spherical when viewed and not flat, how then can our Earth which is also a nodal point produced from the aethereal standing field be flat. The Earth and all other heavenly bodies cannot be flat.
I do not assert that the Earth is spherical because I have travelled into space and had an aerial view of the Earth or because I have done some analysis on the Earth surface. Rather I assert that the Earth is spherical because I know how the universe was formed, and this great knowledge I now share freely with you.
The golden age of science has come! What I now teach you in this great blog are those things that our predecessors sought so hard to know but could not. You are indeed privileged to have come to this blog.
Furthermore, I can call the new cosmology the new big bang theory. In this new big bang theory what really banged or interfered was gravi-electromagnetic waves. Before ever matter was formed, the gravi-electromagnetic wave existed.
The old big bang theory based on the singularity interpretation seems to imply that creation was a chaotic process. This is far from the truth. The new big bang theory which is based on the commonality interpretation informs us that creation was very orderly. This is why the universe is so fine-tuned.
The standing fields we produce in our labs and music halls do not appear chaotic, so why would the creation of our universe be chaotic. Creation was orderly and purposeful from the beginning. There was no singularity point, only common (nodal) points in the universe.
Gravity and Why We Don’t Sense The Earth’s Motion
Now, gravity acts on bodies only as a component of gravi-electromagnetic wave, and when it acts upon the Earth, we realize that we cannot sense the Earth’s motion. This is surprising, to say the least.
Now, let’s return to the reason why we don’t sense the Earth’s motion around the Sun. Classical physics would like us to think that this occurs because the Earth moves about the Sun at an approximately constant speed. So, if the Earth were to accelerate greatly such that its speed becomes greatly non-uniform we would sense the Earth’s motion.
This is not true, no matter how convincing it might look. The universe is more subtle than that. Listen, when we move in uniform motion, we don’t sense our motion, why? Classical physics informs us that this is because of the principle of inertia.
The principle of inertia which applies to uniform motion ensures that we don’t sense uniform motion. For accelerated frames, we have another principle unknown since classical physics which also ensures that we don’t sense accelerated motion.
This new principle is the principle of non-inertia. The fact that the Earth is moving about the Sun at an approximate uniform velocity is not responsible for the reason why we don’t sense the motion of the Earth.
Rather we don’t sense the motion of the Earth because of the principle of non-inertia for accelerated frames and which is analogous to the principle of inertia for uniform frames. Now, what’s the connection between the principle of non-inertia and gravity?
We have always known that when we accelerate by ourselves, we sense accelerated motion, but when we accelerate by gravity, we don’t sense accelerated motion. For the first case, this is because the principle of non-inertia manifests weakly while for the second case of gravity the principle of non-inertia manifests strongly.
When we are moved by gravity, we experience strongly the principle of non-inertia, which further ensures that we don’t sense the accelerated motion of the Earth. So, even if the Earth accelerates greatly due to gravity, we will never be able to sense the motion of the Earth.
This article shows you that we don’t sense the Earth’s motion because of the principle of non-inertia and the association of this new principle to gravity further proves the existence of gravity.
Under no circumstances should we doubt the existence of gravity, just as we don’t doubt the existence of light. Just as special relativity shows us the connection between light and the principle of inertia, so does absolute relativity now shows us the connection between gravity and the principle of non-inertia.
In accordance to these similarities, while light is the speed limit of the universe, gravity is the acceleration limit of the universe. Just as you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, so also you cannot travel faster than the acceleration of gravity. This is the core thesis of gravi-electrodynamics.
Now, what are the principle of inertia and the principle of non-inertia?
According to post-modern physics, the principle of inertia is a principle that states that uniform rest and uniform motion are indistinguishable, while the principle of non-inertia is a principle that states that accelerated rest and accelerated motion are indistinguishable.
The bolded words in the above paragraph show you that there are four states of motion in the universe and not three as standard physics teaches you. The four states of motion are based on the great conceptualization.
Post-modern physics now informs you that there are two forms of rest in the universe, uniform rest and accelerated rest, just as there are two forms of motion in the universe, uniform motion and accelerated motion.
So, a man in a car that is moving in uniform motion must realize that his state of motion is indistinguishable from uniform rest (and not accelerated rest), and another man standing on the Earth surface moving about the Sun must realize that his state of motion with the Earth is indistinguishable from accelerated rest (and not uniform rest).
The figure below shows us the form of rest (which is uniform rest) that uniform motion is indistinguishable from. This is the new interpretation of the principle of inertia; and for uniform rest, as shown, only uniform time dt flows. Don’t just think of rest as rest, it has two forms because of the two forms of time.
And when we move to the observation of the Earth’s motion around the Sun, we realize that the accelerated motion of the Earth around the Sun is indistinguishable from another form of rest in the universe called accelerated rest. For accelerated rest, as shown above, both uniform time dt and accelerated time Δt flow.
This equality between accelerated motion and accelerated rest is called the principle of non-inertia. This principle is the cornerstone of gravi-electrodynamics which is the new relativistic framework for describing accelerated frames.
I want you to understand this new principle because it governs all accelerated frames both outside and inside the atomic world. Understanding this principle will give you the long sought intuitive understanding of quantum mechanics and the true nature of gravity.
Gravity has for so long being without its associated principle, but not anymore. A new understanding of the universe has come, and we must follow it, all of us. No more vagueness and ignorance when we discuss the cosmic entities.
How does this new insight relate to this contention of the flat Earthers? It shows incontrovertibly that gravity exists and that the Earth does not have to be still in order for us not to sense motion.
The Earth can still move at greatly changing speeds carrying us along and it will still appear as though the Earth is still because of the principle of non-inertia. This is absolutely fundamental to our understanding of the Earth.
What ensures that we don’t sense the Earth’s motion is not because the Earth moves at an approximately constant speed but because of the principle of non-inertia which makes the experience of accelerated motion similar to that of uniform motion.
Because of the principle of non-inertia, all our experiences of the motion of the Earth can be compared to an individual in a car moving at uniform motion. If a man in a car moving in uniform motion jumps up he returns to the exact point he lifted from without any backward or forward motion or push. This happens because of the principle of inertia.
The same applies to a man who jumps up from the Earth surface. He returns to his exact spot without any backward or forward push because of the principle of non-inertia. In fact, in post-modern physics, the similarity between the principle of inertia and the principle of non-inertia is called the second correspondence principle.
In the above diagram for why we don’t sense the Earth’s motion, the second correspondence principle is shown by the large equivalence sign between the principle of inertia on the left-hand side and the principle of non-inertia on the right-hand side.
Not understanding gravity completely has spun the flawed conclusion in the flat Earth model that gravity does not exist. Well, I can’t blame the Flat-Earthers so much because classical and modern physics do not tell us what gravity really is.
So, in the face of the fact that gravity has not really being described, one can hurriedly but wrongly conclude that gravity does not exist. However, gravity exists, and this further emphasis should pull you towards the spherical model of the Earth.
No matter where you are on the Earth’s surface, your condition is similar to one experiencing accelerated rest. This is why no body falls off the Earth despite the Earth being spherical. Look again at the above diagram for why we don’t sense the motion of the Earth.
In fact, our understanding of the Earth and our experiences of it goes beyond gravity to the very fact that the universe is a gravi-electromagnetic field. We are not on a planet hanging in empty space, rather we are all immersed in the sea of gravi-electromagnetic wave.
This should make us understand how the different parts of the Earth, referring to the land, the sea and the atmosphere are all held together by the enveloping gravi-electromagnetic field, which is invisible because it is a superluminal field.
This invisible gravi-electromagnetic field is also what holds every other planet and even all the galaxies together. We have to understand this in order to further see why the Earth can in principle really be spherical.
I must say that the current resurgence of the flat Earth model is a subconscious call for us to once again seek to truly understand the motion of the Earth and our experiences of it. There is so much truth about the Earth missing in both the spherical and flat Earth models which if realized will end the contentions once and for all.
In this article, I have excluded the discussion of the universal equivalence principle which would have further shown us how we really experience the Earth. However, you can read about it in my other articles.
The Earth is spherical, and I say this because of my understanding of post-modern physics and not classical or modern physics. I think the whole notion of a flat Earth arises because we cannot feel the motion of the Earth and as I have said, this arises because of the principle of non-inertia and not because of the almost constant speed of the Earth.
This new principle gives us a deeper understanding of why we feel the Earth the way we do. Due to the principle of non-inertia coupled with the new cosmology based on the commonality interpretation and the gravi-electromagnetic wave nature of the universe, we now have a more encompassing understanding of the formation and the motion of heavenly bodies unlike afore times.
Also, you must know that the principle of non-inertia is universal just like the principle of inertia and it applies to all heavenly bodies (and atomic bodies) in the universe. These two principles respectively govern accelerated and uniform motions.
This new knowledge should change the focus of our arguments and should raise concern for how we can further increase our potentials for the exploration of outer space. I am very concerned about this and I want to use this medium to let you know that post-modern physics shows us a way we can design rotating space stations.
This among other things became my concern when I found out that we haven’t been able to accomplish that because we cannot find a rigid pivot is space around which the space station can rotate. I really hope to write an article on this in the nearest future which we lay the conceptual foundation for the design of rotating space stations.
To me, I think that there is so much about the universe which we should be more concerned about than the shape of the Earth. The Earth is spherical, now let’s get concerned about the bigger things.
Until next time,
I remain your friend,
– M. V. Echa