Subtitle: How Gravi-electrodynamics Replaces General Relativity
Modern relativity has two branches, special relativity and general relativity. Special relativity describes how the principles of relativity apply to inertial reference frames, while general relativity describes how the principles of relativity apply to non-inertial reference frames.
Now, post-modern relativity also has two branches, electrodynamics and gravi-electrodynamics. Electrodynamics describes how the principles of relativity apply to inertial reference frames, while gravi-electrodynamics describes how the principles of relativity apply to non-inertial reference frames.
The above two paragraph sums the recent history of the progress in our understanding of relativity. In post-modern physics, electrodynamics is founded on the absolute principle of inertia, while gravi-electrodynamics is founded on the absolute principle of inertia.
I have discussed in the article below the special relationship between electrodynamics and the absolute principle of inertia. I will encourage you to read it so that you can understand how post-modern physics is changing our understanding of the universe and also transforming the history of science.
Post-modern physics now shows us the missing components in Einstein’s general relativity which is supposed to be the extension of special relativity. One of the missing components is the absence of a governing principle for non-inertial reference frames.
There is no doubt that the strong equivalence principle is a useful component of general relativity, but it is not the governing principle for accelerated frames which we need to give us a better understanding of accelerated motion.
The absence of the governing principle for non-inertial reference frames in general relativity is responsible for its three limitations which are its complexity, its ambiguity and its inability to describe the atomic world.
Before I continue on these three limitations of general relativity, let me simply state the missing principle in general relativity which is our current description of gravity. This missing principle is the absolute principle of non-inertia. What does the principle of non-inertia state?
The principle of non-inertia states that accelerated rest and accelerated motion are indistinguishable.
Notice how the principle of non-inertia for non-inertial reference frames stated above is similar to the absolute principle of inertia for inertial reference frames presented in the article referenced above.
This new principle is the foundational principle of gravi-electrodynamics which is the natural extension of electrodynamics, and it presents the post-modern description of non-inertial reference frames.
Now, the need for a better theory arose due to the limitations of general relativity, which as I have said lacks the true fundamental principle required to understand non-inertial reference frames.
Historically, after general relativity was published the three limitations pointed out above became evident. The first limitation was that the theory is complex and this was generally purported by Einstein’s contemporaries.
The second limitation which became evident in due time is that the theory is ambiguous as physicists couldn’t agree on whether general relativity was just only a theory of gravity or whether it applies to all forms of accelerated motion. They couldn’t agree on this.
The third limitation of the theory is that it could not be unified with quantum mechanics. Einstein realized this immediately after he published general relativity, and he suggested that a better theory will have to modify general relativity.
These three limitations still exist till today, and really they wouldn’t be a problem if general relativity is a complete theory, but it isn’t. The true cause of the identified three limitations of general relativity is the absence of the absolute principle of non-inertia.
General relativity, which should have otherwise been a simple theory just like special relativity turned out to be a very complex mathematical theory because of the absence of the absolute principle of non-inertia.
Even the ambiguity of general relativity would be non-existent if it was founded on the principle of non-inertia, for then general relativity will describe all kinds of accelerated motion, whether those that are self-induced or those due to gravity.
This is because the absolute principle of non-inertia is the cornerstone principle for all non-inertial reference frames. With the principle of non-inertia, general relativity would have been a generalised theory which it isn’t.
And to the third limitation, general relativity would have single-handedly without the assistance of quantum mechanics describe the atomic world if it had been founded on the principle of non-inertia.
How can general relativity claim to be an extension of special relativity and not be able to describe the atomic world of constant accelerated motion? This claim in itself proves the falsehood of the theory.
Remember that the atomic world which we seek to describe is filled with particles undergoing constant accelerated motion, so all we need to understand the atomic world and the motion of atomic particles is the absolute principle of non-inertia.
General relativity alone would have provided us with the unified field theory without the incorporation of quantum mechanics which is not a fundamental theory of motion. Now, all these oversights of general relativity have been rectified by gravi-electrodynamics.
Gravi-electrodynamics is simple, non-ambiguous and it’s able to unify physics, all because it is founded on the absolute principle of non-inertia. Just imagine what physics will be like without the principle of inertia.
No need, that is how physics has been since the advent of general relativity without the absolute principle of non-inertia. This principle would have given us a firm grasp of the true operational nature of gravity and of the atomic world.
The only progress made possible by general relativity and for which I praise the theory is in identifying and providing the distinctions between the weak equivalence principle and the strong equivalence principle.
However, in gravi-electrodynamics, these two equivalence principles become unified as the principle of universal equivalence. Both equivalence principles are equivalent. This is not the concern of this article anyway.
Relating the absolute principle of non-inertia with the absolute principle of inertia shows you how the two forms of rests apply to uniform and accelerated motions. I have discussed in the article below the relationship between the two forms of rest and motion.
Gravi-electrodynamics now shows us that accelerated rest, a form of rest that relates to accelerated motion is real and that under certain conditions it is indistinguishable from accelerated motion.
Now, we have two variants of accelerated motion. The first is the acceleration of ponderable (non-charged) bodies outside the atom and the second variant of accelerated motion is that of electrical particles inside the atom.
These two variants of accelerated motion are governed by two different phases of the principle of non-inertia. Ponderable (non-charged) bodies are governed by the weak phase of the principle of non-inertia while electrical particles are governed by the strong phase of the principle of non-inertia.
The weak phase of the principle of non-inertia is responsible for the fact that accelerating ponderable bodies sense inertia under certain conditions and do not sense inertia under certain conditions, especially when influenced by gravity.
It is important to know that the strong phase of the principle of non-inertia is responsible for the new but formerly hidden fact that all accelerating electrical particles do not sense inertia under any condition.
Comparing the two phases of the principle of non-inertia gives you an indication of how it governs the two variants of accelerated motions in the universe. These two phases of the principle of non-inertia are very important in post-modern physics.
Surprisingly, the predictions of general relativity are found howbeit in a different way in gravi-electrodynamics. Gravi-electrodynamics by introducing the absolute principle of non-inertia alters in a very fundamental way the prior predictions of general relativity.
We cannot overlook the new predictions for accelerated frames emerging from post-modern physics. Gravi-electrodynamics shows how the predictions of general relativity are shadows or inverted presentations of the predictions of the true nature of the universe. Gravi-electrodynamics is the new theory of gravity.
So, what does this imply? It implies that general relativity is a flawed theory and it will be a futile effort attempting to reconcile it with quantum mechanics, as is now evident. If we can have another theory that gives us a fundamental description of accelerated motion, then we don’t need general relativity and quantum mechanics to unify physics.
Both general relativity and quantum mechanics lack the essential ingredient to describe accelerated motion which is the purview of their application. Gravi-electrodynamics is the new way of understanding all accelerated frames.
Furthermore, gravi-electrodynamics is the first ever theory of gravi-electromagnetism. It reveals how gravi-electromagnetic wave behaves and how it underpins accelerated motion. We can just establish a simple correlation here.
Electrodynamics reveals how the electromagnetic wave underpins inertial reference frames, while gravi-electrodynamics reveals how gravi-electromagnetic wave underpins non-inertial reference frames.
In post-modern physics, light or the electromagnetic wave is seen as the precedent wave of uniform motion, while the gravi-electromagnetic wave is seen as the precedent wave of accelerated motion.
Both waves are the two non-mechanical waves in the universe. General relativity not being a true wave theory could not account for the absolute principle of non-inertia. The post-modern description of the absolute principle of non-inertia is inextricable from the behaviour of gravi-electromagnetic wave.
In like manner, the post-modern description of the absolute principle of inertia is inextricable from the behaviour of light. The behaviour of light, in this case, is that being proposed by electrodynamics or post-modern physics and not that described by other eras of physics.
Folks, we now have the principle that governs all accelerated frames. Before now we have been at loss concerning the nature of gravity, but not anymore. Post-modern physics now shows us the true nature of gravity, and with the new principle of non-inertia, we now have a firm yardstick for judging any theory on accelerated motion.
So, just as one would expect any theory of uniform motion that violates the principle of inertia to be scrutinized, so also would one expect any theory of accelerated frames that violates the principle of non-inertia to be scrutinized.
“Henceforth we are no longer children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of” scientific theory. We now have a firm scientific foundation for understanding the cosmos and for deriving all judgements concerning the nature of reality. We are now in understanding the measure of the perfect man.
The exploration of the absolute principle of non-inertia will greatly enhance our practical application of mechanics. Also, a close observation of the principle of inertia and the principle of non-inertia show that together they contain the correspondence principle which relates the two forms of rest in the universe.
I want you to now know that we have a theory that is better than general relativity, and this better theory is gravi-electrodynamics. The distinction besides those afore stated in this article is that general relativity is a physical theory while gravi-electrodynamics is a metaphysical theory.
In post-modern physics, we probe and investigate the metaphysical laws of the universe. Since the pursuit for the unified field began, physicists have sought to identify a loophole in general relativity and haven’t.
General relativity has proven itself time and time again to be a formidable theory, but it isn’t. A good look at this article begins to reveal to you that general relativity is not really a formidable or true theory as you may have thought.
General relativity can only go so far as a physical theory, but when we probe the metaphysical operations of the cosmos which is the domain of truth, the whole weakness and loopholes of general relativity become revealed.
How general relativity fails as a true theory of motion becomes evident. I am stating all these about general relativity because gravi-electrodynamics is not a conceptual extension of general relativity.
Gravi-electrodynamics is a lot dissimilar from general relativity, but it is a lot similar to special relativity and herein lies its simplicity. Gravi-electrodynamics contradicts general relativity, and it shows importantly how general relativity does not take into account the absolute principle of non-inertia.
This post-modern correction applies to the entire edifice of physics. Since Galileo, we have been describing accelerated motion without the principle of non-inertia. So, the absence of the absolute principle of non-inertia is a grave oversight in physics.
This cannot continue any longer. Right here in Echa and Science we are concerned about eliminating all the wrong premises in science and ensuring that science becomes inerrant. Gravi-electrodynamics is the theory which now addresses our incomplete or flawed understanding of non-inertial reference frames.
The identified limitations of general relativity are as a result of the non-existence of the principle of non-inertia in classical physics. The metaphysical basis of gravi-electrodynamics shows us how to really understand the mysteries confronting us today.
Furthermore, just like the absolute principle of inertia is a principle of sensational equality and not true equality, so is the absolute principle of non-inertia a principle of sensational equality and not true equality.
I have set the basic understanding of this proposition in my e-book and in the article above on electrodynamics, but I will tell you a little about it now. All bodies in motion carry inertia and all bodies at rest do not carry (dynamic) inertia.
The only reason why the absolute principle of non-inertia holds is because the orthogonality principle prevents bodies in accelerated motion from sensing inertia, thus making their experience of accelerated motion similar to accelerated rest even though inertia is present during accelerated motion and absent during accelerated rest.
The principle of non-inertia just like the principle of inertia is not a principle of true equality. This insight changes how we understanding the universe in a very radical way.
And it changes how we understand and apply the symmetry in the transformations between one frame and another frame. These symmetries only exist because of the sensational equality of accelerated frames and not because they are truly equivalent.
Post-modern physics now reveals to us the reason why we sense inertia and also the reason why we don’t sense inertia. These new insights are necessary in order for us to probe the absolute nature of motion.
This is why the new relativity which has electrodynamics and gravi-electrodynamics as its two branches is called absolute relativity. And by its defining term, you will know that it is a theory that synthesizes the absolute and relative aspects of the universe.
Both aspects which have been a major source of contention in physics are really two unified aspects of the cosmos. This is why I sometimes see the history of science as a dialectical struggle between absolutism and relationism, quality and quantity, form and dimension etc. all of which are aspects of the universe.
(Concerning form and dimension, post-modern physics is now making us realize that reality is richer than we think. We are now beginning to understand these two great and fundamental aspects of reality of which one of these aspects, form, has been neglected since man set on the path of reason.)
So, this post-modern era of science is a natural culmination of the dialectical struggles of science, which brings to fruition the synthesis of all the formerly contradicting aspects of the cosmos.
The discovery of the absolute principle of non-inertia and also the absolute principle of inertia would not have been possible in the prior eras of science because of the discord in the different dual aspects of the universe.
Thus, we are closer to the truth than ever before, and I really hope that we embrace and maintain this new scientific tradition and only discard it if a greater tradition emerges. We should never again separate the unified aspects of the cosmos — for absolute relationism is the new philosophy.
The new post-modern principles of physics may seem strange to you, but I want you to always remember that they are due to the great synthesis of the dual aspects of the universe, that they are due to the cosmic unity of all things.
These principles present you with a universal, unbiased view of the universe. You are neither for classical physics nor for modern physics but for post-modern physics which is the physics of cosmic unity.
We must become very conscious of the transformations this post-modern era of science brings. The practice of a warm science will be concomitant to this new consciousness. The absolute principle of non-inertia among others is a very subtle principle that cannot be properly understood in this current atmosphere of cold, pragmatic science.
The understanding of the principle of non-inertia necessitates a transformation in our scientific traditions. Only a warm, organic science can properly understand and explore the absolute principle of non-inertia.
This new scientific spirit is what I want you to have. This purpose drove me to establish this blog. I realized some time ago how subtle and transcendent these post-modern principles are, so I decided to establish this blog so that you will be introduced to the new spirit behind these principles.
The universe in which we live is not a gigantic machine, it is a vast organic entity with its extensive mind. Without knowing this, you cannot find or understand the simplicity of the seven absolute principles and six cosmic laws.
Knowing all these further reveals to you how vastly different gravi-electrodynamics is from general relativity. The two theories are immersed in two different scientific traditions.
So, even the tests of gravi-electrodynamics mainly show us how our physical observations of the universe are shadows of these behind the veil principles like the absolute principle of non-inertia.
How to understand these behind the veil principles of the universe is the reason why I want you to get my two e-books on the universe. This is a burgeoning physics and I want you to be a part of it. There is a purpose why you have visited this blog in search of the truth.
The absolute principle of non-inertia informs you that accelerated rest and accelerated motion are indistinguishable. When you begin to fully comprehend the simple technical aspects of this principle, you will come to know how accelerated rest applies differently to ponderable (non-charged) bodies and to electrical (charged) bodies.
This principle greatly simplifies physics and eliminates the superfluous components of modern physics introduced by general relativity. Gravi-electrodynamics and the absolute principle of non-inertia introduce beauty to physics and further assures us that we can comprehend the vast cosmos.
Until next time.
The universe is simple.
– M. V. Echa
– Feel free to share this article using any of the social buttons below.