The Post-modern Accelerator Principle

Image source

Introduction

What I am about to inform you about the post-modern accelerator principle is part of the sub-body of articles in this blog that will complete your understanding of electromagnetism based on the concept of the acceleration of light and not on the concepts of charge or magnetic pole.

So, this great scientific article comes as a result of the new post-modern theory of electromagnetism which informs us about the true nature of the electrical world different from what classical and modern physics have informed us.

Now, this article is about the post-modern accelerator principle, or in other words, how accelerators work. In physics and especially in particle physics, accelerators are usually large machines that are used to accelerate charged particles to tremendous speeds.

Accelerators have been around ever since man began to study the behaviour of charged particles in either electric fields or magnetic fields. And since this time, accelerators have evolved into the complex and efficient machines that we have today, like the Large Hadron Collider LHC at CERN.

But ever since we began making use of accelerators to accelerate particles, can we really say that we understand how these accelerators operate? This is because the discoveries of post-modern physics are informing us that we don’t really understand how these accelerators work even though we have been making use of them for a long time now.

This will come as a surprise to you, but it is, however, true, and this is why I have decided to write this scientific article so that I can explicitly explain to you how accelerators work.

Now, before we proceed, let’s first state the modern accelerator principle after which I will state the post-modern accelerator principle which will be used to explain the true operations of particle accelerators.

Stating the Modern Accelerator Principle

Before I state the post-modern accelerator principle, I will like us to look at classical and modern physics, and see what they inform us about the operations of accelerators and from this information state what we can call the modern accelerator principle.

Basically, according to classical and modern physics, an accelerator is able to accelerate charged particles by the controlled creation of electrical or magnetic fields between its two poles or terminals. (This will be diagrammatically shown to you soon.)

However, what is important is to know how these electrical and magnetic fields are created and from there derive the modern accelerator principle. According to modern physics, accelerators create these electrical and magnetic fields through the controlled variation of the property of charge for electricity or magnetic pole for magnetism.

So, succinctly, let me state the modern accelerator principle:

The modern accelerator principle states that charged particles can be accelerated by the fundamental variation of either electric charge to create electric fields or magnetic pole to create magnetic fields.

(“Fundamental variation” simply refers to the fact that an electric charge can take only two possible signs, the positive sign or the negative sign, while a magnetic pole can take only two possible poles, the North Pole or the South Pole.)

The above can be taken as the modern accelerator principle, and it is really how we understand the operation of particle accelerators.

The modern accelerator principle is how we understand the operations of accelerators. We only have to manipulate the property of charge and magnetic pole in order for us to accelerate charged particles.

When we deploy electricity, we manipulate the property of charge and when we deploy magnetism, we manipulate the property of magnetic pole. This is basically how we create an electric field when we use electricity to accelerate charged particles and how we create a magnetic field when we use magnetism.

Some crucial points to criticise comes out when you look at the modern accelerator principle. It is these crucial points that I want to identify in the next section before I then proceed to state the post-modern accelerator principle. 

Criticising the Modern Accelerator Principle
The First Criticism

One of the crucial points to criticize the modern accelerator principle is that it is a decoherent principle that does not truly represent the fullness of electromagnetism. What do I mean?

A good look at the modern accelerator principle shows us that we either have the option of creating an electric field using electricity or a magnetic field using magnets and not both fields. It is on this note that it can be stated that the modern accelerator principle is not based fully on the phenomenon of electromagnetism.

This is very important. Michael Faraday had intuited before the proof came from Clerk Maxwell that light is an electromagnetic field, but the modern accelerator principle does not reflect the unity of electricity and magnetism which is what light is.

We can state affirmatively that according to the modern accelerator principle, no unified electromagnetic field can be created in particle accelerators only either an electric field or a magnetic field. This in itself is a flaw in our understanding of how accelerators work and because of this flaw, we cannot come to the truth about what accelerates particles in an accelerator.

When we deploy electricity, one may say that particle acceleration is due to the unlike charges of the electrical poles, and when we deploy magnetism, one can say that particle acceleration is due to the different magnetic poles of the magnets. There is no way we can ever discover electromagnetism in the modern accelerator principle.

Now, you can contend that we create magnetic fields using electricity (or solenoid), but that’s the point because even in this situation, the modern accelerator principle informs us that particle acceleration is due to the magnetic fields created by electrical means.

What I want you to really look at is the space in an accelerator where particles accelerate. In that space, usually between two plates or poles, according to the modern accelerator principle, there is no electromagnetic field, only either an electric field or a magnetic field.

So, according to the modern accelerator principle, accelerators do not produce electromagnetic fields only either electric fields or magnetic fields. This is primarily how the modern accelerator principle is wrong.

The modern accelerator principle is unapprovedly a decoherent principle of electromagnetism, and this is the first criticism against the modern accelerator principle. The modern accelerator principle should have been a coherent principle that reflects entirely the phenomenon or principle of electromagnetism. You will understand this better when I begin to explain the post-modern accelerator principle.

The modern accelerator principle is unapprovedly a decoherent principle of electromagnetism.Click To Tweet

The Second Criticism

Now, the second criticism of the modern accelerator principle is its dependence on the property of charge and magnetic pole. These are properties of matter and they do not produce the acceleration that moves charged particles in accelerators.

The modern accelerator principle should be field dependent and not matter dependent. We cannot continue to look at the properties of matter in order to understand the effects caused by the two non-mechanical fields in the universe, for even the property of charge and the supposed property of magnetic pole are caused by light which is the non-mechanical field that is important for this article and for the operations of particle accelerators.

The first and second criticisms of the modern accelerator principle are strongly associated. The decoherence of the modern accelerator principle is associated with the two properties of matter, charge and magnetic pole, to which the operations of particle accelerators are attributed or based.

We just can’t understand how accelerators work beyond the concepts of charge and magnetic poles, but post-modern physics is informing us about the operations of particle accelerators beyond these matter based concepts.

Also, these criticisms of the modern accelerator principle are showing us how we can’t really see electromagnetism in our understanding of the operations of particle accelerators and why it is important that we do.

The modern accelerator principle is not a coherent or unified principle. It tells us how on one hand (electrical) accelerators accelerate particles by electrical means and how on another hand (magnetic) accelerators accelerate particles by magnetic means. There is no element of unified electromagnetism in the modern accelerator principle.

And the second criticism of the modern accelerator principle is that it is based on the properties of matter like charge and magnetic pole instead of being based on the field properties of light. I will discuss what these field properties of light are in the post-modern accelerator principle.

Ths second criticism of the modern accelerator principle is that it is based on the properties of matter like charge and magnetic poles instead of being based on the field properties of light.Click To Tweet

So, like I have said, both criticisms are associated since we look at charge when we are describing how accelerators accelerate particles by electrical means and we look at magnetic pole when we are describing how accelerators accelerate particles by magnetic means.

In fact, one can see that the first criticism extends even to the second, the modern accelerator principle is not a coherent principle of electromagnetism.

The capabilities of particle accelerators are truly due to the natural union of electricity and magnetism usually called electromagnetism and not the separate engagement of electricity and magnetism which is due to the decoherence of the modern accelerator principle.

It is this realization that brings us to what post-modern physics informs us about the operations of particle accelerators.

The Post-modern Accelerator Principle

We already know that the natural union of electricity and magnetism manifests itself as the existence of light. Therefore, the capabilities and the operations of particle accelerators can only be due to light and not separately due to electricity or magnetism and not also due to any property of matter.

This is what leads us to the post-modern accelerator principle. The post-modern principle is a principle that informs us about how light or the electromagnetic wave governs the operations of particle accelerators.

Now, the post-modern principle is stated thus:

The post-modern accelerator principle states that charged particles are accelerated by the fundamental variation of the acceleration of light to create electromagnetic fields.

(“Fundamental variation” simply refers to the new fact that the acceleration of light can only two possible values or magnitudes, the lesser magnitude or the greater magnitude.)

The above is the post-modern accelerator principle, and it informs us about how accelerators operate by the unified manifestation of electricity and magnetism known as (the acceleration of) light.

There is no separation of electricity and magnetism in the post-modern accelerator principle like we have for the modern accelerator principle. This is an important discovery!

Particle accelerators are governed by the acceleration of light and not charge or magnetic pole. The acceleration of light is the nature of light in the electrical world and relative to all charged particles.

The acceleration of light is the nature of light in the electrical world and relative to all charged particles.Click To Tweet

Light does not move at a constant speed in the electrical world; and if we had known about the acceleration of light before now, we would have easily seen the errors in the modern accelerator principle. So, the acceleration of light is what represents the true understanding of electromagnetism in the electrical world. 

The post-modern accelerator principle is coherent and also field based and in this manner addresses the flaws in the modern accelerator principle.

The post-modern accelerator principle

A Particle Accelerator 

According to the post-modern accelerator principle, particle accelerators create light and by this creation of light accelerate charged particles. They do not separately create electrical and magnetic fields, rather they create electromagnetic fields.  I really want you to understand this.

We are now understanding the behaviour of particle accelerators in the unified manifestation of electricity and magnetism which is light (and soon I will take us further). We are now seeing how light governs particle accelerators and not any property of matter like charge and magnetic pole.

This is the new realization that I want you to have as I proceed to show you how particle accelerators accelerate an electron and a proton according to both the modern and the post-modern accelerator principles.

I want you to really see the difference between the two principles and from there attain the absolute understanding of the operations of particle accelerators.

Charged Particles in an Electrical Accelerator

Electrical accelerators are accelerators that do not obviously display the property of magnetism even though they are underlyingly set into operation by electromagnetism or the acceleration of light.

Electrical accelerators are accelerators of the kind presented below for the situation in which we have two unlike charged plates and a proton and an electron are placed in the gap between the two electrical plates.

Case 1: An Electron and a Proton in an Electrical Accelerator

The diagram below shows the acceleration of an electron and a proton when they are placed in-between the unlike charged plates of an electrical accelerator.

An electrical accelerator

Now, for an electrical accelerator shown above and according to the modern accelerator principle, the two plates have unlike charges and this is how they are electrically different.

So, the proton p (denoted by the green small ball and) which is taken to be positively charged is accelerated towards the negative plate denoted by the (-) minus sign, while the electron e (denoted by the red small ball and) which is taken to be negatively charged is accelerated towards the positive plate denoted by the (+) sign.

Also, in the modern accelerator principle, these different charges are real and they also apply to both the electrical plates and also to the electron and the proton. The electron is taken to be negatively charged while the proton is taken to be positively charged as have already been said.

So, according to the modern accelerator principle, the two electrical plates have different charge signs and it is for this reason that they are able to accelerate the negatively charged electron and the positively charged proton.

Furthermore, and as already been said, according to the modern accelerator principle an electric field exists in the gap between the two electrical plates. And it is by this electric field that the electron and the proton experience acceleration.

Now, the above modern explanation of the operation of electrical accelerators is wrong, and this is why in the diagram above the negative sign (-) and the positive sign (+) are cancelled on the left-hand side of the diagram. But on the right-hand side of the diagram, we find the post-modern representation of how accelerators operate.

Firstly, the post-modern accelerator principle informs us that the acceleration of light is different in magnitude for both plates.

This is why the plate above is indicated by a greater than sign (>) which means that it is the plate of greater acceleration of light while the plate below is indicated by a lesser than sign (<) which means that it is the plate of lesser acceleration of light.

So, it should really be said that the two plates are electromagnetically different based on the acceleration of light and are not electrically different based on the concept of charge. I want you to really see the how accelerators operate by the unified manifestation of electricity and magnetism knows as light.

So, the plates of the electrical accelerator should rightly be called electromagnetic plates and not electrical plates. For electrical accelerators, like the one above, produce electromagnetic fields in the gap between their plates that accelerate the electron and the proton and not electric fields. Understand these things.

And even the “electrical accelerator” should rightly be called an electromagnetic accelerator, but because of what we can call a magnetic accelerator which are naturally occurring kinds of accelerator that appear different from electrical accelerators, we will maintain that there are electrical accelerators and there are magnetic accelerators.

But in this post-modern era, we will see this distinction as superficial and that both electrical and magnetic accelerators are the two types of electromagnetic accelerators. Electromagnetism is now the foundation for our understanding of the operations of particle accelerators.

Also, these greater than (>)  and lesser than (<) signs and no longer the negative (-) and positive (+) signs are what will now be used in post-modern physics in describing the operations of particle accelerators, and in fact, the operations of the electrical world.

Now, according to the post-modern accelerator principle, the proton is accelerated towards the plate of the greater acceleration of light (>) while the electron is accelerated towards the plate of lesser acceleration of light (<).

The above explanation of the motion of an electron and a proton in an electromagnetic field (and not an electric field) created by the electrical accelerators comes from the post-modern theory of electromagnetism which shows you how the acceleration of light is fundamentally different for the electron and for the proton due to their different masses (since their charge is the same).

This is why in the above diagram, we can see that there are two electromagnetic fields in the accelerator and not one. The first electromagnetic field denoted using longer field lines is the one of greater acceleration of light (>) and it is the field that the proton responds to, while the second electromagnetic field is the one of lesser acceleration of light (<) denoted using shorter field lines and it is the field that the electron responds to.

So, when we are looking at particles accelerating in an electrical accelerator, we must now know that these particles are not responding to an electric field but to an electromagnetic field. Light in its complete essence as an electromagnetic field is what accelerates particles in particle accelerators and not its separate aspects of electricity and magnetism.

We will soon discuss what happens to the concept of charge in post-modern physics, but before then, let’s proceed to the second case where an electron and a proton are placed in an electromagnetic field in-between two electromagnetic plates of the same acceleration of light.

Case 2: An Electron and a Proton in an Electrical Accelerator

In this case 2 depicted below, we want to see the response of an electron and a proton in an electromagnetic field when the two electromagnetic plates have the same greater accelerations of light according to the post-modern accelerator principle and not the same negative charges according to the modern accelerator principle.

an electrical accelerator

This second case is the case where we will say according to the modern accelerator principle that the two electrical plates have the same negative charges, and so because of this, neither the electron nor the proton is accelerated.

But according to the post-modern accelerator principle, this is the case where the two electromagnetic plates have the same greater accelerations of light.

So, there is no comparative paths or fields of lesser and greater accelerations of light, and because of this, the electron is not accelerated as it finds no path or field of lesser acceleration of light to move through and the proton is also not accelerated as it finds no path or field of greater acceleration of light to move through. 

The post-modern description based on the acceleration of light is the right description and not the modern description based on charge. Also, I want you to see how the concept of negative charge (-) is replaced in post-modern physics by the concept of the greater acceleration of light (>).

Case 3: An Electron and a Proton in an Electrical Accelerator

Now, let’s discuss the third case depicted below, where an electron and a proton are placed in-between two electromagnetic plates of the same lesser accelerations of light according to the post-modern accelerator principle and not the same positive charges according to the modern accelerator principle.

An electrical accelerator

In the above diagram, you can see that according to the modern accelerator principle, the electron and the proton are not accelerated because both electrical plates have the same positive charges. This is a wrong understanding of what is happening.

According to the post-modern accelerator principle, the electron and the proton are not accelerated because the two electromagnetic plates have the same lesser accelerations of light.

The electron is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of lesser acceleration of light to move through, while the proton is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of greater acceleration of light to move through.

Also, I want you to see from the above diagram how the concept of positive charge (+) is replaced in post-modern physics by the concept of the lesser acceleration of light (<).

The three cases discussed so far exposes to you how the acceleration of light or the electromagnetic field and not the property of charge governs the motion of particles in an electrical accelerator.

Light is what we really should be looking at and I am certain that your scientific mind understands what I am saying.

Now, let’s move to the second category of this discourse, which is about how charged particles move in a magnetic accelerator.

Charged Particles in a Magnetic Accelerator

An example of a simple magnetic accelerator is two magnets placed in such a manner that their unlike poles face each other with a gap in-between where particles can be accelerated.

Now, magnetic accelerators such as this one arise because of the acceleration of light and not the even more vague concept of magnetic poles. The concept of magnetic poles, North and South, are vaguer than the concept of electric charges, negative (-) and positive (+). 

In fact, I can say that the concept of magnetic pole was just created to represent the difference between the two poles of a magnet and not because we understand why these two different poles exist in the first place.

However, to understand how the two magnetic poles arise and to further discuss how magnetic accelerators operate and are governed by the acceleration of light and not magnetic poles like the North and the South poles, let’s present the first case of an electron and a proton accelerating in a magnetic accelerator.

Case 1: An Electron and a Proton in a Magnetic Accelerator

In the diagram below, the North Pole N is replaced in post-modern physics by the pole of greater acceleration of light (>) while the South Pole S is replaced by the pole of lesser acceleration of light (<).

A magnetic accelerator

Now, according to the modern accelerator principle, the electron is accelerated towards the South Pole while the proton is accelerated towards the North Pole.

And according to the modern theory of electromagnetism, the electrons in the magnet have their collective spin aligned in such a uniform manner that produces magnetism.

This is indicated in the diagram above that shows how the spin of the electrons in the upper and lower magnets are tangentially aligned upwards.

It is good to now remember that for the electrical accelerator shown before, the electrons in the electromagnetic plates have their translatory motion aligned and this is what produces electricity, but for the magnetic accelerator, the rotatory motion or spin of the electrons in the electromagnetic poles are aligned and this is what produces magnetism.

The crucial point to now know is that both the translatory motion and the rotatory motion of the electrons are caused by the acceleration of light. The two phenomena of electricity and magnetism exist because of the acceleration of light.

So, in a crucial sense, and looking at the causal description of both phenomena, we find that they are truly electromagnetic phenomena and not separately electrical and magnetic phenomena.

Looking at the magnets above, according to the post-modern theory of electromagnetism, the spinning electrons are tangentially spinning in the direction of lesser acceleration of light away from the pole of greater acceleration of light (>), and not away from the North Pole N as indicated in the upper magnet, and are spinning towards the direction of lesser acceleration of light (<) and not towards the South Pole S as indicated in the lower magnet.

We are now looking at the causal description of magnetism as it arises due to the acceleration of light. The concept of ‘magnetic pole’ is only relevant in relation to the acceleration of light. The concept of North and South poles is vague and does not produce any true understanding.

So, according to the post-modern accelerator principle and in relation to the acceleration of light, the two ‘magnetic poles‘ are really electromagnetic poles. The two poles are only different based on the difference in the acceleration of light and not due to the superficial designations of North and South poles.

Encompassingly, in post-modern physics, we no longer have the concepts of electrical plates or magnetic poles only the concept of electromagnetic plates or poles. This is because we now describe the operations of accelerators based on the acceleration of light and not based separately on electricity and magnetism which are the results of the unified electromagnetic effects of light.

How light determines the operations of particle accelerators is now the concern of post-modern physics. I want you to come to understand this right now in this article.

So, proceeding with the post-modern accelerator principle, the electron is accelerated towards the electromagnetic pole of lesser acceleration of light and not towards the South Pole, while the proton is accelerated towards the electromagnetic pole of the greater acceleration of light and not towards the North Pole. This is the true understanding of the operations of the magnetic accelerator based on the acceleration of light.

We now have to leave the concept of North Pole and the South Pole for modern physics, in the post-modern world, it’s all different.

Let’s now proceed to case 2 which shows us the response of an electron and a proton placed in-between two similar or like electromagnetic poles of a magnetic accelerator.

Case 2: An Electron and a Proton in a Magnetic Accelerator

The diagram below shows the case where we place an electron and a proton in-between two electromagnetic poles of the same greater accelerations of light (>), or what modern physics will refer to as two North poles N.

A magnetic accelerator

So, according to modern physics, the electron and the proton will not be accelerated because of the two similar North poles of the magnetic accelerator. These two poles are cancelled in the diagram to show that the modern description is wrong.

But according to the post-modern accelerator principle, the electron and the proton will not be accelerated because of the two similar electromagnetic poles of greater accelerations of light (>).

The electron is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of lesser acceleration of light to move through, while the proton is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of greater acceleration of light to move through. For what we call two North poles in modern physics, we call two greater electromagnetic poles in post-modern physics.

Now, let’s discuss the third case.

Case 3: An Electron and a Proton in a Magnetic Accelerator

The diagram below shows the case where we place an electron and a proton in-between two electromagnetic poles of the same lesser accelerations of light (<), or what modern physics will refer to as two South poles S.

A magnetic accelerator

So, according to modern physics, the electron and the proton will not be accelerated because of the two similar South poles S of the magnetic accelerator. These two poles are cancelled in the diagram to show that the modern description is wrong.

But according to the post-modern accelerator principle, the electron and the proton will not be accelerated because of the two similar electromagnetic poles of lesser accelerations of light (<).

The electron is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of lesser acceleration of light to move through, while the proton is not accelerated because it finds no path or field of greater acceleration of light to move through. For what we call two South poles in modern physics, we call two lesser electromagnetic poles in post-modern physics.

The Electromagnetic Unification of the Operation of Particle Accelerators

I want us to discuss the importance of all of this. In a simple explanation, this article informs you about how (the acceleration of) light governs the operations of particle accelerators, both electrical accelerators and magnetic accelerators.

We are no longer looking at the concept of charge and magnetic poles which are properties of matter and not properties of the determining field. The post-modern accelerator principle now informs you about the electromagnetic operations of accelerators and not the separate electrical and magnetic operations of accelerators.

We have always been suspicious of this, but we couldn’t find, until now, a better way of representing this unity when we describe how accelerators operate.

We have been thinking that we can either accelerate particles in an electric field or in a magnetic field, but now post-modern physics informs us that such separation does not exist in nature and that we can only accelerate particles in an electromagnetic field. 

So, what we call electrical and magnetic accelerators are in the true sense electromagnetic accelerators, where electrical accelerators are accelerators that are due to the translatory effects of the acceleration of light on electrons while magnetic accelerators are accelerators that are due to the rotatory effects of the acceleration of light on electrons.

They are both due to the acceleration of light, which represents the unified manifestation of electromagnetism and not due to the property of charge or magnetic pole. Please, you have to understand this.

You have to understand this all the more because it reveals to you something remarkable about the universe and how particles really cannot travel faster than light in particle accelerators.

The particles accelerating in particle accelerators cannot really accelerate greater than the acceleration of light that propels them, but to an observer like us outside the electrical world, this translates to mean that these particles cannot travel faster than the speed of light.

In the electrical world, all particles experience acceleration limit and not speed limit. They cannot travel faster than the acceleration of light.

Furthermore, the post-modern accelerator principle shows us the futility of attempting by accelerators to move these particles beyond the speed of light.

This is because we formerly thought that an increasing electric field or an increasing magnetic field is what is needed in the attempt to move these particles beyond the speed of light, but now the post-modern accelerator principle is informing us that we accelerate these particles by an increasing electromagnetic field which is what light is. So, how can we ever move these particles beyond the speed or acceleration of light?

It is now important to know that there are two electromagnetic fields in particle accelerators and not a single electric field or a single magnetic field as we have thought. And all the practical procedures we deploy only help us alter or cause a fundamental change in the acceleration of light between the two electromagnetic plates or poles and not a fundamental change in charge or magnetic pole. 

There are two electromagnetic fields in particle accelerators and not a single electric field or a single magnetic field.Click To Tweet

For the first case of acceleration of the electron and the proton, there is a phase difference between the two electromagnetic fields in the accelerator. But whenever there is no phase difference, like for the second and third cases, the electron and the proton will not be accelerated.

I want you to really have this basic post-modern understanding of how accelerators operate based on the fundamental variation in the acceleration of light or the phase difference of the two electromagnetic fields in both an electrical accelerator and a magnetic accelerator.

Also you must know that the phase difference does not arise in a superficial manner, rather it is the result of the general and fundamental principle of electromagnetism that informs us that in whatever direction that an electron moves, that it moves in the direction of the lesser acceleration of light, and that in whatever direction a proton moves, that it moves in the direction of the greater acceleration of light.

This applies both to their translatory and the rotatory motion, and this is why we have electrical and magnetic accelerators. 

A single ‘electric field’ or a single ‘magnetic field’ that are found in the modern description of how accelerators work cannot produce these fundamental phase difference that is really why particles accelerate in a particle accelerator or not.

The post-modern accelerator principle is founded on the true electromagnetic nature of the operation of particle accelerators. And having understood this,  I want us to discuss the new relevance of the concept of charge and magnetic poles in post-modern physics.

The Concepts of Charge and Magnetic Poles in Post-modern Physics

No matter how it goes, the concepts of charge and magnetic poles are now auxiliary concepts in post-modern physics. This is because in the electrical world the most important concept is the acceleration of light.

However, comparing the concept of charge and that of a magnetic pole, the concept of magnetic pole has no relevance in post-modern physics. But the concept of charge still maintains its relevance as a property of matter, but it is no longer a determining factor when describing the fundamental interactions in the electrical world.

This is all the more because charge is a universal constant e for all electrical bodies. There is no evidence whatsoever of a different value for electric charge (forget the standard model, it is wrong).

Also, since electrons and other particles are accelerated by the acceleration of light and not by the property of charge, it then makes no sense to continue to preserve the concepts or designations of negative and positive charges.

This is why in post-modern physics charge e is a positive constant for both the electron and the proton, (and it can be a negative constant, just be sure to maintain the sign for both the electron and the proton).

The post-modern theory of electromagnetism is not based on the concept of charge any longer but on the concept of the acceleration of light. This is the new understanding and I want you to have it.

Also, for some time now, physicists have been searching for a monopole, which is simply a single magnetic pole and it has not been discovered even though it has been predicted by some bizarre and wild theories of physics.

The post-modern accelerator principle informs us that there are no such thing as magnetic poles not to now talk of a magnetic monopole, and this comes alongside the fact that charge has only one sign, which is positive.

Therefore, the concept of dual electrical charges and magnetic monopoles do not exist in post-modern physics and also in the universe. What we now have for both the electrical and magnetic accelerators are the electromagnetic plates or poles and they are properties of and due to the electromagnetic field and not due to matter.

So, we are no longer looking at matter but at the electromagnetic field; therefore, why should we seek for what is not there?

Furthermore, since we only have electromagnetic poles, therefore, this implies that we should seek for electromagnetic monopoles. Can we find them? Yes. They are found in electrical accelerators where electrons make translatory motion due to the acceleration of light and not in magnetic accelerators where electrons make rotatory motion due to the acceleration of light.

In electrical accelerators, the electromagnetic plates can respectively be seen as electromagnetic monopoles, but in magnetic accelerators, the electromagnetic poles cannot be seen as electromagnetic monopoles because in every magnet, we always have two electromagnetic poles.

So electromagnetic monopoles exist (in electrical accelerators) but magnetic monopoles do not exist. We can even say that the distinction between an electrical accelerator and a magnetic accelerator is that electrical accelerators possess electromagnetic monopoles while magnetic accelerators do not possess electromagnetic monopoles. I think this is a sufficient distinction between an electrical accelerator and a magnetic accelerator.

Now, I want us to discuss something very important about the post-modern accelerator principle before I summarize this article, and this important thing is about the quality of the post-modern accelerator principle.

The Quality of the Post-modern Accelerator Principle

When you go to the foundation of post-modern physics from where this post-modern accelerator principle emerged, you will understand the quality of it, which is something I have not mentioned so far and that I may not spend so much time on in this article.

But here it goes: The quality of the post-modern accelerator principle is that particles can only be impressed with acceleration or force and not with any other quantity like velocity or momentum.

Particles in accelerators always carry force and this is associated or rather due to the fact that these electrical particles are governed by the strong phase of the principle of non-inertia.

The understanding of this principle alongside the post-modern accelerator principle will give you the ramifying and satisfying grasp of the supposedly mysterious double slit experiment which has been demystified in this great science blog.

So, the motion of electrical particles in accelerators is not as a result of their deviation from uniform motion but due to the fact that they can only maintain and experience accelerated motion. Get Absolute Relativity to further understand this and also read my articles in this blog. 

Summary

This article informs you about the post-modern accelerator principle, which unlike the modern accelerator principle, is based on the acceleration of light or you can just say light if you already understand the essence of light in the electrical world.

This proper interpretation differs from the modern interpretation which separates electricity and magnetism when explaining how accelerators work. So, we now understand the operations of accelerators based on the unified manifestation of electricity and magnetism which is light.

In this new post-modern principle, we find that accelerators operate by the fundamental variation of the acceleration of light, which can only have two primary magnitudes, which are the greater magnitude (>) and the lesser magnitude (<).

These fundamental differences in the acceleration of light for any two electrical particles like the electron and the proton used in this article arise from and have been explained in the post-modern theory of electromagnetism, of which this article is simply an offshoot.

So, whatsoever is still left of the separation of electricity and magnetism in the understanding of particle accelerators is now dissolved in the unified study of electromagnetism.

And finally, in this post-modern era, the new accelerator principle is what will be applied in the explanation of the operations of accelerators, and if the former false and decoherent interpretation could take us this far, how much more will the true and coherent interpretation take us.

Until next time,

I will be here.

– M. V. Echa



M. V. Echa

M. V. Echa

My message is the universe, my truth is the universe, and this blog contains all you need to know about the universe, from the true nature of reality to the long-sought unity of the cosmos — which is the big picture!